Lately there has been a lot of confusion about the continental united States Marshals. Arguments have been presented specifying the historical background of the continental marshals in these united states. The problem with the historical argument is there is no history for the continental marshals. The continental Marshals Service have never existed until the people created it in recent years.

Fore a comprehension of what is actually taking place, one must go back to the year 1789. The U.S. Marshal Service was created by an act of congress in the first session when it passed the Judiciary Act of 1789. So from the very beginning, the marshal service was referred to as the U.S. Marshal Service. Over the years, the U.S. Marshal service was transferred to the United States, the federal corporation that has taken the place of the de jure, or original jurisdiction, government. So since at least 1946, the U.S. Marshals Service only worked for a corporation and not the government.

Since 2015, however, the U.S. Marshals service lost its charter with the United States and have only been working short term contracts for courts and local law enforcement. What this means, though, is those agents who wear the U.S. Marshal emblems are still by definition U.S. Marshals, they do not work for or service the United State corporation or the united States of America.

Some have also argued the the continental Marshals are federal marshals. As previously pointed out, the U.S. Marshals have never been referred to as anything other than U.S. Marshals as of September 12th, 1789. Those who are proposing that the continental Marshal should be called "federal marshals" may have an ulterior motive to move the continental marshals into the control of the federal government. As the continental marshals are currently established, they are under of the control of the state grand juries established by the people with oversight from the superior court justices. But where do the people get this authority?

As anyone who has read the Constitution for the United States of American knows, the Constitution was "ordained and established" by "We the People". So the people were the sovereign creators who decreed the constitution to be the supreme law of the land. This did not, however, make subjects of the people who retained their sovereignty after the signing of the Constitution for the United States of America. The Constitution was written to put a fence around government so as to control its unbridled growth. As such, the Constitution for the United States of America does not apply to people, it only applies to government agents.

That same Constitution guarantees a republican form of government. What is a republican form of government?

A republican government is one in which the powers of sovereignty are vested in the people and are exercised by the people, either directly, or through representatives chosen by the people, to whom those powers are specially delegated. In re Duncan, 139 U.S. 449, 11 S.Ct. 573, 35 L.Ed. 219; Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162, 22 L.Ed. 627. [Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, p. 626] 

Take note of the words " either directly". That means we can have representatives take care of our business or we can choose to take care of it ourselves. So if the people decide that the representatives who are required to abide by The Constitution for the United States of America decide said representatives are not abiding by said Constitution, the people can created whatever they want in order to make sure that happens. Does this mean that the continental marshals fall under the Constitution for the United States of America. To a point, but only to the point that they do not infringe on the rights of the people. The people are the highest authority in these united States of America. No government agency has any authority whatsoever to rule over people. So if the people decide to create a new organization called the continental united States Marshal Service, it is the prerogative of the people to do so.

Arguments have also surfaced that the continental Marshals are state militias because they are controlled by the grand juries within the state. This, too, is a misperception, because state militias are not authorized to cross state lines. When the people established the continental Marshals, they authorized them to cross state lines. That by definition is not a state militia.

A final argument is that the continental marshals are limited to the land jurisdiction and have no authority over the air and sea jurisdiction. This supposition, too, is flawed, because all three jurisdictions are subject to the people. However, in considering the state boundaries, county boundaries, or postal district boundaries, land sea and air we have to remember the boundaries are ficititious. They are fake. They do not exist. Looking back at the fact that the Vatican laid out the plans for Washington DC, we must acknowledge that control was planned from the very beginning. This was done through deceit. The Bill of Rights amended the Constitution of the United States of America, a document that to this day does not exist. President Trump took an oath swearing to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of America, a document that does not exist. So when one starts talking about boundaries, just look at the oath of office that continental marshals, superior court justices and grand jurist took. It says we will protect people wherever they are. It does not say if we take one step over a fictitious boundary we cannot protect the people on that side of the boundary. Since the Vatican set up the whole thing for he purpose of controlling people, we must be wary of those who associate with the Vatican as possible accomplices working to stop the forward progression of the people in taking back control of their rightful jurisdiction.The people, being the sovereigns, are overlords to all areas within the bounds of these united States of America. So if the people want to create a law enforcement organization to start enforcing their common law everywhere they reign in service to God, it is again their prerogative.

So be wary of arguments that attempt to move the control of the continental marshals into federal jurisdiction. The continental marshals have never existed in the history of the united States of America and have never been associated with postal districts of any other district. Those who argue that the continental marshals would be considered "enemies of the state" have forgotten which state they are referring to. After all, the corporate state has already labeled the American People the enemy in the Trading with the Enemy Act.

Defend Freedom™