https://tftr.narsol.org/2018/09/05/private-attorney-general/

Private Attorney General

Posted on September 5, 2018 2 Commentson Private Attorney General

By James Coghill

I’m a paralegal not a lawyer. What I am about to write should not be construed in any way as legal advice and this information is provided for your education only, freely given without charge. What you do with this knowledge is entirely up to you.

To get into court as a normal citizen and raise a claim you must have a legal standing to be there and you must prove it to the court. This works to prevent frivolous claims. Otherwise you must hire a lawyer which then gains you admission to the club. The lawyer then serves as a filter for frivolous cases.

What most people don’t know is what is contained in Civil Rights Act of 1866 which makes every citizen a Private Attorney General. This was something new to me. After 15 years of working with the law I had never seen this before which is why I present this info here. Even my father an attorney for 50 years hadn’t heard of this. The quotation below comes from Coralyn Hill vs. The State of Arizona DUNS number: 072459266

PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL

According to the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 14 Stat. 27, enacted April 9, 1866, (and sometimes referred to as The Private Attorney General Act), 39th Congress, Session 1, Ch 31 (1866), CHAP. XXXL, (Formally titled): An Act to “Protect all Persons in the United States in their Civil Rights, and Furnish the Means of their Vindication,” April 9, 1866; Public Law 104-317, Oct 19, 1996, 110 Stat 3853; 93 stat 1284; Public Law 96-170, 96th Congress, Dec 9th 1979.4:

“Private attorney general is an informal term usually used today in the United States to refer to a private party who brings a lawsuit considered to be in the public interest, i.e., benefiting the general public and not just the plaintiff. The person considered “private attorney general” is entitled to recover attorney’s fees if he or she prevails. The rationale behind this principle is to provide extra incentive to private citizens to pursue suits that may be of benefit to society at large.”

The private attorney general, made its first appearance in the legal literature in a 1943 decision, by Judge Jerome Frank, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See Assoc. Indus. of New York v. Ickes, 134 F.2d 694, 704 (2d Cir. 1943). Judge Frank concluded that Congress could authorize a private citizen to file suit even if the sole purpose of the case were to vindicate the public interest as opposed to some private interest of the litigant: “Such persons, so authorized, are, so to speak, private Attorney Generals.”

In drawing this conclusion, Judge Frank analogized this citizen suit to a qui tam action. Id. at 704-705 discussing U.S. ex rel. Marcus v. Hess, 317 U.S. 537 (1942)); and also Colorado Radio Corp. v. F.C.C., 118 F.2d 24, 28 (D.C. Cir. 1941) (Edgerton, J.,concurring).

The plaintiff holds the position as a private Attorney General, under the 1866 Vindication and Civil Rights of the 39th Congress. This Congressional Act gives the Plaintiff the authority to step in, when the states fail or the government fails to uphold and protect the rights of the citizens. It allows the plaintiff to act as a prosecutor, and enable him to bring charges on those who hold public office and hold them accountable for their misdeeds and misconduct, in breach of their trustee duties as fiduciaries; as is written in the Lieber Code, Under General Orders No. 100. This includes insurrection and rebellion, and misuses of their/that public office in order to abuse and to incite riot among the peaceful inhabitants, as well as endanger the lives and health of United States Citizens.

The part in quotes really says it all. Any citizen can bring a case before the court as long as it impacts the public interest, and benefits the general public, not just the plaintiff. I don’t see any reason this law can’t be used to our benefit. All we have to do is use our imagination till something sticks on the wall. You see. In real American Government you are the most powerful element of all. They just want you to never learn that because they can’t control you once the tombstones have been lifted from your eyes

From a targeted individual site. But a good example redress complaint could use most of the contents of this complaint to state, federal officials. Use at your own risk.

The undersigned represent the interests of more than 1,000 Targeted Individuals ("Non-Investigative Subjects"). We demand an explanation for these activities and compensation for pain, suffering, and illegal torture. A similar letter has been sent to General John Raymond at the Air Force Space Command. As a leader in the DHS, we demand that you immediately CEASE AND DESIST your illegal activities, including the use of government personnel and any external groups, which may also be participating. Such operations are in violation of Article 32 of the Geneva Conventions (psychological torture) and numerous Federal & State laws.

This CEASE AND DESIST ORDER is to inform you that your harassing, stalking, and intimidation actions are illegal and will not be tolerated. We demand that you immediately CEASE AND DESIST. Should you continue to pursue these activities in violation of this CEASE AND DESIST ORDER, we will not hesitate to pursue further legal action against you.

This CEASE AND DESIST ORDER demands that you immediately discontinue and do not at any point in the future, under any circumstances, do the following: pursue, harass, attack, strike, bump into, brush up against, push, tap, grab, hold, threaten, telephone (via cellular or landline), instant message, page, fax, email, follow, stalk, shadow, disturb the peace, keep under surveillance, hack electronic devices, gather information about and/or block movements at home, work, social gatherings, in public areas, or religious functions.

You may have already violated numerous Federal laws, including:

- 18 U.S. Code § 2381; Treason.
- 18 U.S. Code § 2340; (c) Conspiracy to commit torture.
- 18 U.S. Code § 2382; Misprision of Treason.
- 18 U.S. Code § 2384; Seditious Conspiracy.
- 18 U.S. Code § 2389; Recruiting for service against the United States.
- 18 U.S. Code § 241; Conspiracy to Deprive Constitutional Rights;
- 18 U.S. Code § 242; Deprivation of Constitutional Rights;
- 18 USC § 2261A Interstate Stalking,
- 18 USC § 875(c) Interstate Communications,
- 47 USC § 223(a)(1)(c) Harassing Telephone Calls
- 18 U.S. Code § 1961; Organized Crime Control Act of 1980. (RICO)
- Numerous State laws, defined below.

Should you choose to continue your current activities, we will not hesitate to file complaints with Police Departments and publicly expose your ongoing criminal activity.

This letter does not constitute an exhaustive statement of our position, nor is it a waiver of any rights or remedies in this or any other related matter.
We insist on your immediate compliance, and expect a written response within two weeks.

Signed,

It is obvious their beast system is failing. Nothing is going their way. So they find ways to arrest and entrap us patriots. Any thing becomes a crime now. It is a sin problem. Not a crime  problem.  Now they make covid a crime. Messed up society. Stuck on stupid.

https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2014/05/07/hollywood-boycott-9/
 

https://boycotthalal.org/category/foods/

https://freeinhabitant.info/common-law-court-of-record/trial-by-jury-jurors-needed-common-law.htm

https://sevencells.com/product/ivermectin-may-help-protect-against-viral-illnesses/

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/12/how-i-beat-covid-19-48-hours-ivermectin-wayne-allyn-root/

These links look great. General help for first time jailed.

https://www.pointsincase.com/articles/guide-to-jail

https://www.inmatesurvival.com/how-to-survive-in-prison-or-county-jail-as-a-first-timer-first-time-offender/

https://freedom-school.com/law/court-cases-supporting-no-license.html

A CA injury lawyer says no license to practice law required to be a " lawyer". CA , VA a couple of the states not requiring that.

https://freedom-school.com/law/court-cases-supporting-no-license.html