Could someone who understands the law answer one question for me. I am an heir in an estate that is being settled, I want to write the commissioner of accounts and the attorneys that represent the estate for the court concerning some issues i consider wrong, In signing these and any other documents I want to sign them correctly. is there any problem in signing documents this way.
All rights reserved
A People of the State of xxxxx
Xxxxx X. Xxxxx
if this is incorrect would someone correct me in this, this is important to me, in understanding this, I appreciate all the work all of you do here, I hope one day to be able to speak these matters like many of you do.
There is nothing wrong with signing that way. You do not need to sign the people of thing. You should sign in red ink and use your thumbprint in red ink touching your signature. Red ink signifies you are a living soul.
M. R. Hamilton
Thank you, I like that.
Michael
I would not put a dot in the middle name i would use either my full first middle and last or with out my middle name and just my first and giving last name no period as they still try a way to hold you accountable for a fiction entity, the only reason why i use - ; is because my common law id is made in that name that way, through the secretary of state but if you have not done that yet i would not use that or a post location..Here are some you could look into more
18 U.S. Code § 1342 - Fictitious name or address
Whoever, for the purpose of conducting, promoting, or carrying on by means of the Postal Service, any scheme or device mentioned in section 1341 of this title or any other unlawful business, uses or assumes, or requests to be addressed by, any fictitious, false, or assumed title, name, or address or name other than his own proper name, or takes or receives from any post office or authorized depository of mail matter, any letter, postal card, package, or other mail matter addressed to any such fictitious, false, or assumed title, name, or address, or name other than his own proper name, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 763; Pub. L. 91–375, § 6(j)(12), Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 778; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.
)
18 U.S. Code § 1341 - Frauds and swindles
Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, or to sell, dispose of, loan, exchange, alter, give away, distribute, supply, or furnish or procure for unlawful use any counterfeit or spurious coin, obligation, security, or other article, or anything represented to be or intimated or held out to be such counterfeit or spurious article, for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice or attempting so to do, places in any post office or authorized depository for mail matter, any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by the Postal Service, or deposits or causes to be deposited any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by any private or commercial interstate carrier, or takes or receives therefrom, any such matter or thing, or knowingly causes to be delivered by mail or such carrier according to the direction thereon, or at the place at which it is directed to be delivered by the person to whom it is addressed, any such matter or thing, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. If the violation occurs in relation to, or involving any benefit authorized, transported, transmitted, transferred, disbursed, or paid in connection with, a presidentially declared major disaster or emergency (as those terms are defined in section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122)), or affects a financial institution, such person shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 763; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, § 34, 63 Stat. 94; Pub. L. 91–375, § (6)(j)(11), Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 778; Pub. L. 101–73, title IX, § 961(i), Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 500; Pub. L. 101–647, title XXV, § 2504(h), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4861; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXV, § 250006, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2087, 2147; Pub. L. 107–204, title IX, § 903(a), July 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 805; Pub. L. 110–179, § 4, Jan. 7, 2008, 121 Stat. 2557.)
Those statutes only apply to government agents. They do not apply to people. I write my name anyway I see fit, because it will not affect my decision in my court. i do not care hast the judge or anyone else thinks, because if the judge make an order, I will vacate his order. If he does it a 2nd time, I will hold him in contempt of court. If he does it again, he just might find out that the continental marshals are much closer to commencing the arrests of traitors than he would have liked.
people need to get off the the hang up with the judge making a decision. Judges do not just presume that you know what you are doping because of the way you sign your name or the fact that you filed an action in court of record. Every one of them will test you at least once no matter what you put in your docs. your attitude needs to be exactly as it would if i came into your house, sat in your favorite easy chair and ordered you to bring me dinner and a beer. How would you treat me in those circumstances. That is exactly the attitude you should have in your court. The judge will be looking for nervousness or doubt on your part and will use that against you to get you to bow down tio him. that is why all of you arguments should be on paper. You should never argue orally in court. The absolute last thing you want is a hearing.
M. R. Hamilton
