So many Americans today are concerned about terrorist and ISIS they fail to notice the greatest threat to American freedom. As with any country, the greatest threat to a nation is not from without but from within. Enemies within look like us, talk like us and walk like us, but they are far from actually being like us.
M. R. Hamilton has sent you a group email from aFreeCountry.com.
Hello fellow patriots,
The Terms of Service ("ToS") at aFreeCountry.com have been updated. It is critical for anyone who is a member of a BAR association or is a practicing attorney and a member of aFreeCountry.com to read the ToS as continuing to use aFreeCountry.com hereinafter means you agree to the terms in its entirety. The relevant added paragraph is below.
A case that has made its way through court recently provided a good learning lesson that warrants discussing before taking your case to court. In the case we learned this lesson recently, it would have prevented having to correct the judge later.
This article is dedicated to all of you court clerks all across these united states who so diligently keep track of court documents for perpetuity. You court clerks seem to be the scapegoats of the American jurisprudence industry in these united states. You may think that the judges who direct you cares about whether or not you get into any kind of legal issues when it comes to making decisions about the format or quality of a document when someone comes to you to file it. This article delves into exactly what a court clerk is permitted to do and what you are not permitted to do.
As many of you already know, government does not have any jurisdiction over people without the people's consent. They do, however, have jurisdiction over "citizens" as defined in the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Once people make a habit of recognizing words in the correct legal sense, it makes it much easier for them to see when a statute applies to them, and when it does not, which is always.
Many people depend on their state Constitutions for protection against government overreach. People misperceive that something in their state constitution grants their state governments authority over said people. However, once people learn to differentiate between people and person and people and persons, it becomes much easier to tell which part of the constitution may apply to him/her/them and which applies to other persons.
One of the best ways to discredit anyone who exposes the truth, or anything for that matter, that the status quo does not want exposed is to call the messenger a "conspiracy theorist". After all who would believe those crazy people?