:anthony-ll:
Care of: General Executor Office
general post office judicial district
Post Road: 201-13th Street #28532
Oakland, California [94604-8532]
In sui juris
Claimant

in

‘Federal Court’

                                at
          
district courts of the united States

for the Northern District of California 

i; a man known as         	    ) CASE NO.  __________
	:anthony-ll: [Dominick],	    ) 

Trust Res: Special, Private, Priority. 

                    Claimant        ) Nature of case: claim.
                                    ) Right[cf. Private Right of 
  					    )	Action] at Law 
                       v.           ) For Trespass and Trespass
                                    ) on the Case
KAMALA DEVI HARRIS, 		    )		
SHAYNE M CHRISTMAN, LUIS F. RAMOS,  )  	(Verified)
JOSEPH E. TOLL, JAMES E. ALLEN,     )
JASON DEITSCHMAN, Chad David Finke, )		
Thomas Allen Rasch, Tina Gresio,    )
Billy Myers AND 			    )
HURSHEL VERNON MYERS:               )
                  Wrongdoer(s).     )

i, require: a ‘court of record’, Amendment VII.
CAUSE OF ACTION – TRESPASS AND TRESPASS ON THE CASE
PARTIES
1.  i, :anthony-ll: [Dominick], (hereinafter “Claimant”) is a living private-man on the land, an aboriginal people of California, and in this court of record claims and declares on each of the following: KAMALA DEVI HARRIS, SHAYNE M CHRISTMAN, LUIS F. RAMOS, JOSEPH E. TOLL, JAMES E. ALLEN, JASON DEITSCHMAN, Chad David Finke, Thomas Allen Rasch, Tina Gresio, Billy Myers AND HURSHEL VERNON MYERS, all collectively known as “Wrongdoer(s)”); who are each summoned to answer said Claimant in a plea of trespass and trespass on the case, to wit: 

INTRODUCTION
2.	“Take judicial notice that i,:anthony-ll: [Dominick], states and declares that my civil liberties protected by the Constitution of the United States Bill of Rights are being violated”. I have included a copy of the demand notice that denies my 5th amendment right to due process. Some individuals using fictitious names for them an alleged Wrongdoer(s) have begun a simulated legal process under color of State law in an attempt to extort my life, liberty and private property. For this court of public record, my full legal name is styled: :anthony-ll: [Dominick], and in this name only may I sue or be sued. The use of any other pseudonym, nickname, legal fiction or the like as a substitute for my full legal name is a violation of my civil liberties and I ask for investigation and complete remedy.
3.	Wrongdoer(s) have left the Claimant with the impression from the political propaganda and correspondence in years past, that the Claimant is required to register or pledge his automobiles and contract/franchise as a Driver in commerce for his ordinary business to the state agency for the paying of fees, to compel conversion of “Unalienable -Rights” into statutory “privileges”, surrendering sovereign immunity and reclassify a people into a legal person, resident and public officer subjecting him to Statutory Vehicle codes or private law (Color of law) and police powers.
4.	Accordingly, this has caused the Claimant injury in terms of the impoundment of private property by the unconstitutional eminent domain, deprived of enjoyment of private property, invasion of privacy, involuntary servitude and deprivation of rights under color of law. The Claimant has encountered through the conspiracy, constructive fraud, concealment and kidnapping of his legal status, and becomes the object of government enforcement activity with the unconstitutional bill of attainder by the administrative penalization. Furthermore, Claimant’s person has been sued in an article lV and I administrative franchise court, which is a conflict of interest, lacking jurisdiction and standing by a government contractors. 

Claimant has requested the basis for the Wrongdoer(s)’ jurisdiction.

SPECIFICS
5.	On March 16th, 2015, Claimant sent Defendant a Notice of Estoppel and Stipulations for a Constitutional Challenge to all California State Statues, along with an acceptance and adoption of Wrongdoer’s Oath of Office, challenging their jurisdiction. This letter is Exhibit “AA” which is incorporated by reference as though fully stated herein. 
6.	On April 13th, 2015, Claimant sent Wrongdoer an opportunity to cure of the second Notice of Estoppel and Stipulations for a Constitutional Challenge to all California State Statues, which created a fault by the Wrongdoer. This letter is Exhibit “BB” which is incorporated by reference as though fully stated herein.
7.	On June 2nd, 2015, Claimant sent the Wrongdoer a 3rd Notice of Estoppel and Stipulations for a Constitutional Challenge to all California State Statues, allowing for an additional three days for Wrongdoer to address demand for jurisdiction. This letter from Claimant is Exhibit “CC” which is incorporated by reference as though fully stated herein. 
8.	Claimant denied any further extension of time in his reply to the Wrongdoer’s general acquiescence and notary issues a certificate of non-response.  This certification of non-response is Exhibit “DD” which is incorporated by reference as though fully stated herein. 
9.	Claimant issued a res judicata on the Wrongdoer. This letter for Wrongdoer is Exhibit “EE” which is incorporated by reference as though fully stated herein.  
10.	On July 1st, 2015, Wrongdoer(s) stop and detain Claimant in automobile.  This affidavit from Claimant is Exhibit “FF” which is incorporated by reference as though fully stated herein.
11.	Wrongdoer(s) impound Claimant’s automobile. This affidavit from Claimant is Exhibit “FF” which is incorporated by reference as though fully stated herein.
12.	On March 23rd, 2016, Claimant sent Wrongdoer(s) the Notice of Tort Claims for Distress Against Public Bonds and Violations of 18 USC 241 and 18 USC 242 (Complaint and Claim), Affidavit by Claimant, and the Summonses with The International Court of Commerce case number: ICC-2016-0010202. These letters from Claimant is Exhibit “GG” which is incorporated by reference as though fully stated herein.
13.	On May 13th, 2016, Claimant sent Wrongdoer(s) a NOTICE OF FAULT with an OPPORTUNITY TO CURE. These letters from Claimant is Exhibit “HH” which is incorporated by reference as though fully stated herein.
14.	The Wrongdoer(s) went in Default for a lack of any verified response received by the Claimant. These letters from Claimant is Exhibit “II” which is incorporated by reference as though fully stated herein. 
15.	An Affidavit in support of the facts for the Notice of Default in Dishonor Consent to Judgment is Exhibit “JJ” which is incorporated by reference as though fully stated herein.
16.	The Notary Acceptor issued a CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE OF NONE RESPONSE. These letters from Claimant is Exhibit “KK” which is incorporated by reference as though fully stated herein.
17.	On examination of all available information provided by the Wrongdoer(s), Claimant is unable to determine any basis for Wrongdoer(s) having any jurisdiction over the Claimant. Claimant, :anthony-ll: [Dominick], alleges that Wrongdoer(s) do not have any jurisdiction, acted Ultra Virus and violated and perjured their Oaths of Office by injuring the Claimant’s private rights protected by the California, U.S. Constitutions and international law.
LAW OF THE CASE
18.	Exhibit “LL” is incorporated by reference as though fully stated herein.

FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT
19.	Exhibit “MM” is incorporated by reference as though fully stated herein.
EXTRACT TRUTH OF AN OATH FOR RIGHT TO TRAVEL
20.	Exhibit “NN” is incorporated by reference as though fully stated herein.
Extract STATEMENT OF RESIGNATION
21.	Exhibit “OO” is incorporated by reference as though fully stated herein.
Extract STATEMENT OF REVOCATION
22.	Exhibit “PP” is incorporated by reference as though fully stated herein.
notice of exIstEnce of will
23.	Exhibit “QQ” is incorporated by reference as though fully stated herein.
notice of exIstEnce of GeneraL EXECUTOR

24.	Exhibit “RR” is incorporated by reference as though fully stated herein.
Notice of the Acceptance and Adoption of the Constitutions and oath of office
25.	Exhibit “SS” is incorporated by reference as though fully stated herein.
DEMAND NOTICE
26.	Exhibit “TT” is incorporated by reference as though fully stated herein.

REQUEST FOR RELIEF
27.	WHEREFORE, Claimant wishes relief, compensation and judgment against Wrongdoer(s) as follows: 

On all causes of action: 
28.	That the court enter a declaratory judgment that:
A. Wrongdoer(s) have no jurisdiction over Claimant including but not limited to payment of any judgments, DMV registrations fees or taxes. 
B. Claimant is exempt from the requirement to registering his automobiles outside of using them in commerce and with a recognizing by the Wrongdoer(s) of the Claimant’s right to be free to travel on the roads and highways without hindrance by any Law Enforcement Agencies.
C. Claimant is exempt from the requirement of having a Drivers License and with the recognizing by the Wrongdoer(s) of the Claimant’s right to be free to travel on the roads and highways without hindrance by any Law Enforcement Agencies. 
D. Claimant seeks Collection of Damages, without delay, from the Wrongdoer(s) creating an ‘account receivable’. Claimant has listed seventy-seven (77) Constitutional and Bill of Rights violations valued at $10,000 per violation times eleven (11) Wrongdoer(s) for a total value of eight million four hundred seventy thousand dollars ($8,470,000.00) in Functional Currency of the United States. The surety/property utilized to guarantee the payment of this commercial lien is the operational/commercial bonds of each of the Wrongdoer(s). If the bond(s) of the Wrongdoer(s) is/are insufficient for the coverage of the payment(s) of the assets of the Wrongdoer(s) will be utilized as follows: all the real and moveable property and bank and savings accounts of the Wrongdoer(s) except wedding rings, keepsakes, family photographs, diaries, journals, etc., and the property normally exempted in the lien process (includes survival provisions). Wrongdoer(s) will be held liable for the entire satisfaction of the lien individually or collectively, meaning that if the Claimant is unable to collect its damages from one Wrongdoer it will seek collection from another Wrongdoer or Wrongdoer(s) until satisfied. Claimant is seeking to collect the remaining damages through the levying of any real and personal property, bank accounts, vehicles and other assets as necessary to satisfy the claim. This includes the seizure of the following real and personal property: Homes located and other real and personal property to be determine.
E.  Claimant demands the Insurance policy holders associated with the associated Bar numbers from the respective state referenced in this proceeding, the accompanying insurance policy account numbers, as well as the following: 
1. A certified copy of their power of attorney to serve in that office on the behalf of the people.
2. The authorization from the Internal Revenue Service to go forward with prosecution in all cases.
F. Wrongdoer(s) are to provide the name, address and telephone number of their public hazard and malpractice bonding company and the policy number of the bond and a copy of the policy describing the bonding coverage of their specific job they are performing at no cost to the Claimant.
G.  Wrongdoer(s) can take no action at law or suit in equity, in personum or in rem, civil or criminal, against the Claimant regarding of any issue of traveling on the road and highways including but not limited to willful failure to register automobiles, possess a driver license or similar allegations.  
H. Any accounts or trusts, whether express, implied, constructive, or cestui que and known as “ANTHONY DOMINICK JR”, “ANTHONY DOMINICK”, or similar variants are exempt from statutory laws and to be place on the “do not detain, do not stop” registers and that there shall be no further communication - including but not limited to phone, email, mail, fax, and skype - with those entities including but not limited to the trustees, grantors or beneficiaries of those entities.  The State of California must update their records accordingly.  
I. Claimant requests copies of the public Debt form 1522 and public Debt Form 4000.  Since all of the bonds were listed on public Debt form 1522 and public Debt Form 4000 to get the CUSIP numbers and personal finances/securities/monies/credit for all of the cases related to or with the name of the Claimant. These forms were used to attach the public debt onto citizens without full disclosure or without the people’s consent – making them all null and void. 
J. Wrongdoer(s) or Claimant may order that any and all records regarding this case be sealed in order to maintain the continuity of the democracy and the confidentiality of the republic.  Claimant maintains access to all sealed items without a court order.  A court order for all other parties is required to access sealed records. 
K. Claimant demands certified copy of the Wrongdoer(s)’:
1. Oath of Office [Title 5 USC § 3331]
2. Officer Affidavit [Title 5 USC § 3332] and/or
		3. Employee Affidavit [Title 5 USC § 3333]
		4. Surety Bond [Title 5 USC § 2901]
		5. Insurance and Registration [Title 22 USC § 611 & 612] 
L.  That the court grants Claimant such other and further relief as the court deems proper;

For the prevention of any removal of the Claimant from the protections of the First Amendment, the Claimant is rebutting any FALSE inferences that the Claimant is making an “appearance” as a “pro se”, thus FALSELY inferring that Claimant is acting in a representative capacity as an officer of this court involved in a franchise. 

i, :anthony-ll:, allege that a “pro se” is a person under legal disability, who is in receipt of a franchise by virtue of representing another, which other is the very “public officer” who is the only proper “person” or “individual” or “taxpayer” who is the subject of the I.R.C. Subtitle A. For i do not consent to act on behalf of such a person and i derive no benefits from said franchise.

Instead, the status of the Claimant is superior to that of a “pro se”, and for this status is with an indication in the Affirmation at the end of every filed pleading in this case:

“sui juris. Of his own right; possessing full social and civil rights; not under any legal disability, or the power of another, or guardianship. Having capacity to manage one’s own affairs; not under legal disability to act for one’s self.” [Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition. P 1434]
For any Claimant is with a challenge in the producing of a case in which a sanctioned litigant fits all of the circumstances of the Claimant as a sui juris, nontaxpayer not engaged in a “trade or business” (26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(26) with no domicile within any internal revenue district, any United States judicial district, or any federal area within the exterior limits of any state of the Union, and who is NOT a “pro se” of a franchisee of any kind. For the Claimant can find no case law that is on point that involves litigants similarly situated or who raised EXACTLY the same questions.
i have read and am aware of the foregoing writing.  i have personal knowledge of the foregoing facts and am competent to testify as to the truth of those facts if called as a witness.  i declare under penalty of perjury of the United States of America that the foregoing facts are true and correct, and that this affirmation was executed in Oakland, California on __________ _____, 2017.  

____________________
:anthony-ll: [dominick]., suri juris, Grantor