RIGHT TO TRAVEL MALLQUI VS NEW JERSEY

55 posts / 0 new
Last post
jgartner
court of record

I did just read something that a court of record is the final judgement and cannot be appealed or reviewed by another court is this true ? 

M. R. Hamilton M. R. Hamilton's picture
Yes that is true

The decisions of a court of record may not be reviewed by any court not a court of record. The Supreme Court has opined

M. R. Hamilton
No Lawyer? No Problem?

M. R. Hamilton M. R. Hamilton's picture
This is a court of record
  1. COURT OF RECORD. To be a court of record a court must have four characteristics, and may have a fifth. They are:

    A. A judicial tribunal having attributes and exercising functions independently of the person of the magistrate designated generally to hold it [Jones v. Jones, 188 Mo.App. 220, 175 S.W. 227, 229; Ex parte Gladhill, 8 Metc. Mass., 171, per Shaw, C.J. See, also, Ledwith v. Rosalsky, 244 N.Y. 406, 155 N.E. 688, 689][Black's Law Dictionary, 4th Ed., 425, 426]

    B. Proceeding according to the course of common law [Jones v. Jones, 188 Mo.App. 220, 175 S.W. 227, 229; Ex parte Gladhill, 8 Metc. Mass., 171, per Shaw, C.J. See, also, Ledwith v. Rosalsky, 244 N.Y. 406, 155 N.E. 688, 689][Black's Law Dictionary, 4th Ed., 425, 426]

    C. Its acts and judicial proceedings are enrolled, or recorded, for a perpetual memory and testimony. [3 Bl. Comm. 24; 3 Steph. Comm. 383; The Thomas Fletcher, C.C.Ga., 24 F. 481; Ex parte Thistleton, 52 Cal 225; Erwin v. U.S., D.C.Ga., 37 F. 488, 2 L.R.A. 229; Heininger v. Davis, 96 Ohio St. 205, 117 N.E. 229, 231]

    D. Has power to fine or imprison for contempt. [3 Bl. Comm. 24; 3 Steph. Comm. 383; The Thomas Fletcher, C.C.Ga., 24 F. 481; Ex parte Thistleton, 52 Cal 225; Erwin v. U.S., D.C.Ga., 37 F. 488, 2 L.R.A. 229; Heininger v. Davis, 96 Ohio St. 205, 117 N.E. 229, 231.][Black's Law Dictionary, 4th Ed., 425, 426]

    E. Generally possesses a seal. [3 Bl. Comm. 24; 3 Steph. Comm. 383; The Thomas Fletcher, C.C.Ga., 24 F. 481; Ex parte Thistleton, 52 Cal 225; Erwin v. U.S., D.C.Ga., 37 F. 488, 2 L.R.A. 229; Heininger v. Davis, 96 Ohio St. 205, 117 N.E. 229, 231.][Black's Law Dictionary, 4th Ed., 425, 426]

The only court the keeps a "record" is a court of record. All other courts just keep notes. This is right out of Black's Law Dictionary 4th edition. I told you previously those who want to control all of us, including you, control our information. That is why the common law references in the index of "The Constitution of the United States of America" was removed. They want it to be harder to find those common law cases. Fortinbras, I know this is hard for you to swallow. But you just told me I do not know what a court of record is and here is the definition right our of one of the most used law dictionaries out there. I appreciate this is not what you were taught. If you work for a government agency, your information is controlled even more than that of attorneys who do not work for the government.

Think about this. Joe Banister worked in the criminal investigative division of the IRS. He learned that the IRS had no authority to enforce an income tax. He was trained by the feds to investigate and spent two years doing so. He went to his supervisor with a 2 1/2 inch binder of evidence that supported what he found. His supervisor slid a resignation letter across the desk to him and told him to sign it or get fired.

If you watch the movie Freedom to Fascism, you will see Joe Banister and 3 other former IRS agents testify they all learned the same thing. I started 26 years ago studying law to actually prove a guy wrong that told me I was not required to pay income tax. It angered me, because I am very patriotic and was incensed that he would accuse our government of lying to us. I was young and still equated government to country. As you and I both know, government is that group of people trying to control the country.

In the course of my research, I proved him right. That angered me even more, because I thought if they are lying about something they use to take people property and imprison them, what else are they lying about. What you find here on this site is the result of that 26 years of research. I learn something new every day and it doesn't get any better for those in government who are committing treason on a daily basis. You want to make sure you are on the side of the united states of America when the arrests start and not the United States corporation. Anyone who forces the people to abide by statutes is warring against the Constitution and the republic. So if you disagree with what I have said on this site, you better make sure you are right, because there is not much time left. This is not just me. It is thousands upon thousand of people all across the country. Continental judges, marshals and grand jurists are swearing on daily. It will not be safe to be a criminal public servant for much longer.

Just do your research and know for sure what you are saying. I know what you are doing here, and I can appreciate your passion. I am just as passionate about my beliefs too, but I did not allow my beliefs to blind me. You should not either.

M. R. Hamilton
No Lawyer? No Problem?

robert deason
right to travel

Mmallqui, with regard to your right to travel, are you still in possession of a drivers license, whether valid or not?

Robert Deason

Pages

Log in or register to post comments