Rights websites

13 posts / 0 new
Last post
SJC
Rights websites

www.thepagg.com

 

www.outlawslegal.com ( no longer exists) Quatloos exposed the lawyer that ran this website 

 

www.uslawbooks.com/travel/travelcities.com- Driver Licensing vs. Right to Travel

 

www.finesandfeesjusticecenter.org- New organisation by former CA judge

 

www.endforfeiture.com

 

www.cldc.org  -protest rights training

 

www.lighthouseliberty.club - goes by Liberty Law Club

 

www.nationallibertyalliance.org

 

www.onefreemanswar.com

 

http://www.no-debts.com/anti-bar/

 

www famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/Articles/Christian/GovReligion.htm

 

 

www.lawyouamerica.com :(

 

 

I have posted numerous resources all over these forums. Each person should find what works for them. These postings are just for information and research nothing more. Although they may be helpful to a few people.

M. R. Hamilton M. R. Hamilton's picture
Not a good site

The lawyouamerica site is not good. That does not mean it does not have good information, but on the very first page the publisher used the terminology "represent yourself". You never represent anybody. When you go into court, you are present. You do not need to be re-presented or presented again. Last time I was in court, the judge kept trying to get me to say I represent myself and I finally said, "I am present. I do not need to be re-presented." He then dropped it and moved on. I got a pat on my back on the way out of the court from the bailiff. These guys like to see us average Joes win sometimes. They are just trying to keep their jobs.

Liberty and ignorance cannot co-exist, because
"He who sleeps on his rights has none."

Superior Court Chief Justice Badge #20001

dieseldoc
Bailiff's

These guys are learning to 

A) not touch us not really average Joes,

B) that we are kinda smart cookies

 

its getting entertaining 

SJC
Reformers in progress

Right! I agree. I run into a lot of locals and municipal officials that bully people and enjoy getting a lawyer makes everything right? Not! I asked questions to these moron wealthy pig lawyers that can't answer simple questions to simple problems like housing issues. From my experience with housing so called laws, and municipal stupidity can say this the real lawyers are the people!

SJC
Hatch Act recreated

People need laws>>>>>  that are made by the People. The Reformers (non-elected, non-political types)!

 

The Hatch Act is a good federal law made by lawyers to spurn and burn stupid political officials. It is a work in progress if the People (you and I ) take hold of it and reform it to boot out lots of elected morons that think they are gods of the little us Peoples!

M. R. Hamilton M. R. Hamilton's picture
Need to assert the 13th Amendment

What needs to happen is the people upholding the original 13th amendment which was never appealed. It was, in fact, duly ratified and never repealed. http://www.amendment-13.org/

Liberty and ignorance cannot co-exist, because
"He who sleeps on his rights has none."

Superior Court Chief Justice Badge #20001

SJC
More interesting sites

www.theconstitutionalresourcecenterdotcom.wordpress.com/petition-for-red...

 

also,  looks like good pdf online book....   The Judiciary Stole The Right to Petition by Gordon Warren Epperly, found on.... www.usa-the-republic.com-

SJC
One of those patrolmen for the border quoted this in his book

"Put loyalty to the highest moral principals and to country above loyalty to persons, party, or Government department. (Officers Handbook, M-68, page 4 code of ethics of government service.

SJC
Deceased MA activist attorney taught common law....
SJC
Affidavit of truth

Kind of funny form but using parts of it may be helpful

File Attachments: 
SJC
Breaking rules to win

A lot of info

File Attachments: 
SJC
Traffic stop Constructive Notice

Traffic Stop Constructive Notice

You are responsible to verify any and all information for your own use. Remember that legal information is not legal advice.

TO: Police Officer, Sheriff, or Law Enforcement Officer, Peace Officer, or agent
please take notice of this information:

The individual man or woman presenting this information (constructive notice) to you is doing so in a good faith attempt to protect you from yourself. Me, I have a good deal of respect for the public service job you are doing and understand how difficult it is to seek out and prosecute criminals. However, this document is presented at a ´traffic stop´. Comity applies.

Where an individual is detained, without a warrant and without having committed a crime (traffic infractions are not crimes), the detention is a false arrest and false imprisonment.
Damages awarded. Trezevant v. City of Tampa, 741 F.2d 336 (11th Cir. 1984)
Motorist illegally held for 23 minutes in a traffic charge was awarded $25,000 in damages. The above case sets the foundation for ~$65,217 dollars per hour, or ~$1,800,000 (1.8 M) dollars per day. If you want to make me rich - detain me for as long as you like.

"The Fifth Amendment provides that no person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself in a criminal prosecution but also privileges him not to answer official questions put to him in any other proceeding, civil or criminal, formal or informal, where the answers might incriminate him in future criminal proceedings." LEFKOWITZ v. TURLEY, 94 S.CT. 316, 414 U.S. 70 (1973).

"The privilege is not ordinarily dependent upon the nature of the proceeding in which the testimony is sought or is to be used. It applies alike to civil and criminal proceedings, wherever this might tend to subject to criminal responsibility on him who gives it. The privilege protects a mere witness as fully as it does one who is a party defendant." MC CARTHY v. ARNDSTEIN, 266 U.S. 34, 40, 45 S.CT. 16, 17, 69 L.ED. 158 (1924).

"...where the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination is involved...the court has always construed its protection to ensure that an individual is not compelled to produce evidence which later may be used against him as an accused in a criminal action. ... The protection does not merely encompass evidence which may lead to criminal conviction, but includes information which would furnish a link in the chain of evidence that could lead to prosecution, as well as evidence which an individual reasonably believes could be used against him in a criminal prosecution." HOFFMAN v. UNITED STATES, 341 U.S. 479, 486, 71 S.CT. 814, 95 L.Ed. 1, 18 (1951).

"in KASTIGAR v. UNITED STATES, 406 U.S. 441, 92 S. CT. 1653, 32 L.Ed. 212 (1972), we recently reaffirmed the principle that the privilege against self incrimination can be asserted in any proceeding, civil or criminal, administrative or judicial, investigatory or adjudicatory. Id., at 444, 92 S.Ct. AT 1656; LEFKOWITZ v. TURLEY, 414 U.S. 70, 94 S.CT. 316, 322, 38 L.Ed. 274 (1973).

"WE have recently noted that the privilege against self-incrimination --- the essential mainstay of our adversary system -- is founded in a complex of values. ... To maintain a fair state individual balance, to require the government to shoulder the entire load ... to protect the inviolability of the human personality, our accusatory system of criminal justice demands that the government seeking to punish an individual produce the evidence against him by its own independent labors, rather than by the cruel, simple expedient of compelling it form his own mouth. ... In sum, the privilege is fulfilled only when the person is guaranteed the right to remain silent unless he chooses to speak in the unfettered exercise of his own will."

"...there can be no doubt that the Fifth Amendment privilege is available outside of criminal court proceedings and serves to protect persons in all settings in which their freedom of action is curtailed in any significant way from being compelled to incriminate themselves." MIRANDA v. ARIZONA, 86 S.CT. 1602, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)

Please also NOTE: the above, as stated by the Supreme Court, are rights and privileges as guaranteed by the Constitution, and anyone (including judges) who knowingly violates those rights may be civilly and criminally liable under several federal statutes. Please see: United States Code, Title 18 Section 241 (Conspiracy against Rights), and Section 242 (Deprivation of Rights under color of Law); Title 42 Section 1983, 1985, 1986 (Civil Rights).

Officer, I cannot and will not provide you with any information that may later be used against me in a civil or criminal proceeding. This includes producing documents that may or may not be in my possession. If there is some important information that you wish to impart to/upon me, please do so in a respectful manner. I do hope you will have a good day.

Respectfully submitted,

__________________________________, reserving all rights, proceeding Sui Juris

SJC
Soverigns Handbook

Uncommon Sense: Global Sovereigns Handbook by Johnny liberty

PDF download www.freeinfosociety or www.newearth.university

Log in or register to post comments